Legal Opinion

Sweeney v. Dahl

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided November 10, 1943PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChapman, J.

The case comes to this Court upon exceptions filed to rulings and final decision of the presiding Justice of the Superior Court. The action of forcible entry and detainer originated in the South Portland Municipal Court and went to the Superior Court upon appeal, where it was submitted to the presiding Justice, sitting without a jury, on an agreed statement of facts with right of exceptions reserved.

The facts essential to the consideration of the case, as they appear in the agreed statement, made a part of the bill of exceptions, are as follows:

The defendant, as a tenant at will, occupied…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Swan v. Justices of Superior CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  2. Champ v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1859
  3. Adams Express Co. v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. Rising v. StannardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1821
  5. Estabrook v. Steward Read Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1930

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Concord General Mutual Insurance v. Patrons-Oxford Mutual InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  2. Harrington v. HarringtonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1970
  3. Reggep v. Lunder Shoe Products CompanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1968
  4. Toussaint v. StoneSupreme Court of Vermont · 1951
  5. North School Congregate Housing v. MerrithewSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API