Farris ex rel. Dorsky v. Goss
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtThaxter, J.
The issue before the court in this case is a narrow one. The requisite number of electors of the state in accordance with the provisions of Article XXXI of the Constitution have taken the necessary steps to initiate a certain measure entitled “An Act to Protect the Right to Work and to Prohibit Secondary Boycotts, Sympathetic Strikes, and Jurisdictional Strikes.” This proposed law which we shall hereinafter refer to as- the “Barlow Bill,” or the “initiated measure,” was on March 25th and 27th, 1947, in accordance with Article XXXI, supra, proposed for enactment to the Legislature then in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Plunkett v. Old Colony Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
- Old South Ass'n v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Bayon v. BeckleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
- Inhabitants of Guilford v. Inhabitants of MonsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1936
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Morris v. GossSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1951
- McGee v. Secretary of StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006
- Kelly v. CurtisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
- Reggep v. Lunder Shoe Products CompanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1968
- Allen v. QuinnSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.