Legal Opinion
Inhabitants of Ashland v. Wright
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided January 6, 1943PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThaxter, J.
In this real action the plaintiff seeks to recover possession of twenty-eight parcels of land situated in the Town of Ashland. The case was heard on an agreed statement of facts by the justice presiding at the April Term of the Superior Court for the County of Aroostook who entered the following order: “Judgment for Plaintiff. Writ of possession to issue.” From this ruling the case is before us on exceptions by the defendant.
The issue is the validity of a tax assessment of the plaintiff town of April 1,1939. Certain taxes were assessed against this defendant oñ the land here in question. In…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Church of the Holy Trinity v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Reiche v. Smythe, CollectorSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Silver v. LaddSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- State v. DaySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1933
- Perkins v. KavanaughSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Reggep v. Lunder Shoe Products CompanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1968
- Greaves v. Houlton Water Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1948
- Blier v. Inhabitants of Town of Fort KentSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1971
- Bernard v. Cives Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- Emple Knitting Mills v. City of BangorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1959
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.