Legal Opinion

Farrow v. Hoffecker

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided February 23, 1906No. 87PublishedCited by 18 opinions

to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been received by the plaintiff through the negligence of the defendant.

1Opinion of the Court

Lore, C. J.,

charging the jury:

Gentlemen of the jury:—Howard Farrow the plaintiff claims that on the 22nd day of February, 1905, while in the exercise of *224due care he was walking on North Street in the town of Dover, in this State, John T, Hoffecker, the defendant, negligently fired a gun from the window of his dwelling house, and wounded the plaintiff in the head; thereby inflicting injuries, for which the plaintiff seeks to recover damages in this action.

The defendant claims, that he shot at some dogs, which were fighting in the street in front of his dwelling house, to the annoyance of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wilson v. BowenMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Hawes v. KnowlesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
  3. Riewe v. McCormickNebraska Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Jardel Co., Inc. v. HughesSupreme Court of Delaware · 1987
  2. Reynolds v. WillisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1965
  3. Riegel v. Aastad Ex Rel. AastadSupreme Court of Delaware · 1970
  4. Sammons Ex Rel. Sammons v. RidgewaySupreme Court of Delaware · 1972
  5. Nance v. ReesSupreme Court of Delaware · 1960

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API