Legal Opinion

State Farm Life Insurance Co. v. Martinez

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 2007No. 05-0812PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brister

It has long been the rule in Texas that if an insurer promptly interpleads policy proceeds, it cannot be subjected to statutory penalties for delayed payment even if it missed the statutory deadlines. The Legislature’s 1991 changes to the Insurance Code suggest the courts should not continue imposing a different deadline. But nothing in those changes suggests that statutory penalties should apply after interpleader occurs. Thus, we hold the court of appeals here properly imposed statutory penalties for the delay before interpleader was filed, but improperly imposed them thereafter.

I.…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Fleming Foods of Texas, Inc. v. RylanderTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Texas Department of Protective & Regulatory Services v. Mega Child Care, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2004
  3. University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. LoutzenhiserTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Universe Life Insurance v. GilesTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Republic Underwriters Insurance Co. v. Mex-Tex, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2004

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Lamar Homes, Inc. v. Mid-Continent Casualty Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Fort Worth Transp. Auth. v. RodriguezTexas Supreme Court · 2018
  3. AMX Enterprises, L.L.P. v. Master Realty Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2009
  4. DaimlerChrysler Motors Co., LLC v. Manuel, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2012
  5. Traxler v. Entergy Gulf States, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2012

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API