Legal Opinion

DaimlerChrysler Motors Co., LLC v. Manuel

Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)

Decided February 24, 2012No. 02-07-00299-CVPublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANNE GARDNER, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Following a bench trial in this breach of contract case, the trial court rendered judgment for damages against Appellant and Cross-Appellee DaimlerChrysler Motors Company, LLC (Chrysler) and in favor of Appellees and Cross-Appellants Tommy J. Manuel, Tommy Manuel Auto Leasing, Inc., and Manuel Auto Sales, Ltd. (collectively, Manuel) but denied recovery of Manuel’s attorney’s fees. 1 In four issues, Chrysler contends (1) that the best efforts provision in its contract with Manuel is unenforceable or that Chrysler conclusively proved that it complied…

2Cases cited111 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  3. In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. HavnerTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Coker v. CokerTexas Supreme Court · 1983

106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Wayne Ventling v. Patricia M. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Bob Montgomery Chevrolet, Inc. v. Dent Zone Companies, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2013
  3. dallas/fort Worth International Airport Board v. Vizant Technologies, LlcTexas Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Fortitude Energy, LLC v. Sooner Pipe LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2018
  5. Yazdani-Beioky v. SharifanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2018

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API