Legal Opinion

Fehrs v. McKeesport

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 27, 1935No. Appeals, 53 and 54PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Simpson,

In the early part of 1931, the City of McKeesport, defendant below and appellant here, had been improving a 147-acre park for public use. In the course of the improvement it removed stumps of old trees, blasting them out with dynamite, dynamite caps and fuses. Prior to May 17, 1931, the park had been opened to public use, although the improvement had not been fully completed. On that day the minor plaintiff, who was twelve years of age, was taken for a walk in the park by his cousin and two twin girls, fifteen years of age. He was carrying with him a small toy,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Howarth v. Adams Express Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Murray v. FrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  3. Burrell Township v. UncapherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887
  4. Rachmel v. ClarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  5. Wood v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Whitner v. LojeskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  2. Leoni v. ReinhardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Mars v. Meadville Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Styer v. ReadingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  5. Reichvalder v. Borough of TaylorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API