Legal Opinion

Leoni v. Reinhard

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 27, 1937No. Appeal, 2PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Barnes,

The question presented by this appeal is whether the plaintiff has stated a good cause of action. The minor plaintiff was injured by the explosion of unslaked lime. The statement of claim avers that defendant’s truck was carrying a load of such material on a state highway, near Swatara Station, in Dauphin County, during the afternoon of April 22, 1935, As the vehicle passed the minor plaintiff, a child twelve years of age, who was walking along the highway, a piece of nnslaked lime fell from the truck and was picked up by him. He placed it in a bucket of damp…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hoag v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1877
  2. Rugart v. Keebler-Weyl Baking Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  3. Nirdlinger v. American District Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  4. Bruggeman v. City of YorkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  5. Venzel v. Valley Camp Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. DeLuca v. Manchester Laundry & Dry Cleaning Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  2. Zanine v. GallagherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Kite v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  4. Brusis v. HenkelsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  5. Finnin v. NeubertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API