Legal Opinion

Reichvalder v. Borough of Taylor

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 31, 1936No. Appeal, 200PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion bv

Mr. Justice Schaffer,

In this action to recover damages for personal injuries to the minor plaintiff, the jury found in his and his mother’s favor. The trial judge entered judgment non obstante veredicto for defendant. On appeal to the Superior Court, the action of the trial court was reversed and judgment was directed to be entered on the verdict. (120 Pa. Superior Ct. 217.) We allowed an appeal.

The minor was about seven years old when injured. He and other children had climbed on a road scraper which had been deposited by employees of defendant borough on a vacant lot at the end of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Scibilia v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Fitzpatrick v. PenfieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  3. Thompson v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  4. Szilagyi v. BethlehemSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. Guilmartin v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Glass v. FreemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. Morris v. Mount Lebanon Township School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  3. Patterson v. Palley Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  4. Thompson v. Reading Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. Hogan v. Etna Concrete Block Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API