Legal Opinion

Healy v. Beer Institute

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 19, 1989No. 88-449PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

491 U.S. 324 (1989)

HEALY ET AL.

v.

THE BEER INSTITUTE ET AL.

No. 88-449.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued March 28, 1989

Decided June 19, 1989[*]

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT

Robert F. Vacchelli, Assistant Attorney General of Connecticut, argued the cause for appellants in both cases. With him on the briefs for appellants in No. 88-449 were Joseph I. Lieberman, former Attorney General, Clarine Nardi Riddle, Acting Attorney General, and Richard M. Sheridan, Assistant Attorney General. William A. Wechsler filed briefs for appellant in No. 88-513.

Jeffrey I.…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Blackmun; Concurring in the judgment; Dissent.

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Craig v. BorenSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn. v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Edgar v. Mite Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Hughes v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Chinatown Neighborhood Assn v. Kamala HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  2. Sam Francis Foundation v. Christies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  3. Sam Francis Foundation v. Christies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  4. Sam Francis Foundation v. Christies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API