Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Sam Francis Foundation v. Christies, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 5, 2015No. 12-56067, 12-56068, 12-56077Published

1Concurrence

BERZON, Circuit Judge, with whom Circuit Judge PREGERSON joins,

concurring in part.

I concur in the majority opinion insofar as it holds the California Resale Royalty Act, Cal. Civ.Code § 986 (“the Act”), unconstitutional as applied to out-of-state art sales conducted by out-of-state agents. As the Act so applied “directly controls commerce occurring wholly outside the boundaries” of California, it violates the dormant Commerce Clause. Healy v. Beer Inst., 491 U.S. 324, 336, 109 S.Ct. 2491, 105 L.Ed.2d 275 (1989); see also Valley Bank of Nev. v. Plus Sys., Inc., 914 F.2d 1186, 1189-90 (9th…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Valley Bank of Nevada, a Nevada Banking Corporation v. Plus System, Inc., a Delaware Membership CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  2. Healy v. Beer InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API