Legal Opinion
Eureka Financial Corp. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided March 27, 1991No. CIV-S-90-1296 DFL GGHPublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
GREGORY G. HOLLOWS, United States Magistrate Judge.
Previously pending on this court’s law and motion calendar for March 14, 1991, was plaintiff’s motion to compel further answers to interrogatories and production of documents from The Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company. The parties filed a timely stipulation pursuant to E.D.Cal.R. 251. Having now reviewed the pleadings and heard oral argument, the court hereby issues the following order.1 BACKGROUND
On January 12, 1988, plaintiff Eureka Financial Corporation (Eureka) filed the underlying complaint for breach of contract and bad faith…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Richard Davis v. Robert H. FendlerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Raymond M. GrayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- The Permian Corporation and Occidental Petroleum Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- Marquis v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. v. The Honorable Lee R. West, Professional Asset Management v. Penn Square BankCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Nevada Power Co. v. Monsanto Co.District Court, D. Nevada · 1993
- Thompson v. United States Department of Housing & Urban DevelopmentDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2003
- Mancia v. Mayflower Textile Servs. Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 2008
- Thomas v. CateDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
- Pagano v. Oroville HospitalDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1993
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.