Legal Opinion
Pagano v. Oroville Hospital
District Court, E.D. California
Decided February 2, 1993No. CIV S-92-0324 GEB GGHPublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*686ORDER
HOLLOWS, United States Magistrate Judge.
Previously pending on this court’s law and motion calendar for January 7, 1993, was plaintiff’s motion to compel production of documents and further answers to interrogatories. The parties filed a timely stipulation regarding their discovery disagreement, pursuant to E.D.Cal.R. 251(c). The court has carefully reviewed the moving papers and heard oral argument, and hereby issues the following order. BACKGROUND
The underlying complaint alleges antitrust violations under the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, against defendant Oroville Hospital, and…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Soto v. City of ConcordDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1995
- Condit v. DunneDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Griffith v. DavisDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1995
- Doubleday v. RuhDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1993
- Smith v. SmithDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1994
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.