Legal Opinion
Veile v. Martinson
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 30, 2001No. 00-8005PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRORBY, Senior Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs David M. Veile and Veile Mortuary, Inc. appeal the district court’s conclusion they did not possess a protected property interest in a rotation policy established by defendant Gordon D. Martin-son, the Coroner of Washakie County, Wyoming, and the court’s decision to strike an expert witness designation on the property interest issue. Further, they challenge the district court’s refusal to give a particular jury instruction in the trial on defendants Michael L. Bryant’s and Bryant Funeral Home, Inc.’s counterclaim alleging antitrust violations,…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Adler v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Ruiz v. McDonnellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- RUIZ v. McDONNELLCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Hardeman v. City of AlbuquerqueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Christopher OsingerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Seifert v. Unified GovernmentCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.