Legal Opinion
Seifert v. Unified Government
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 27, 2015No. 13-3153PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARTZ, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff Max Seifert brings civil-rights claims under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985 and state-law retaliation claims against Defendants Unified Government of Wyan-dotte County and Kansas City, Kansas (the Unified Government), Wyandotte County Sheriff Donald Ash, and Wyan-dotte County Undersheriff Larry Roland. Plaintiff, a former reserve deputy for the Wyandotte County Sheriff’s Department (WCSD), alleges that Defendants removed him from investigations and revoked his reserve commission because of his testimony supporting allegations by a former criminal defendant of…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Pembaur v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Garcetti v. CeballosSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Hinkle v. Beckham County Board of CountyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
- Tufaro v. Board of Regents of the University of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2024
- Lech v. Von GoelerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2024
- Bird v. Regents of New Mexico State UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- Estate of Holmes v. SomersDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2019
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.