Legal Opinion

United States v. Christopher Osinger

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 4, 2014No. 11-50338PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge RAWLINSON; Concurrence by Judge WATFORD.

OPINION

RAWLINSON, Circuit Judge:

Appellant Christopher Osinger (Osinger) challenges his conviction for stalking in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2261A. Osinger asserts a facial challenge to 18 U.S.C. § 2261A as unconstitutionally vague on its face and as applied to his conduct.

*941Osinger also maintains that the district court’s sentence of 46 months’ imprisonment was unreasonable because his acceptance of responsibility and a sentencing disparity warranted a more lenient sentence. We affirm Osinger’s conviction and sentence.

I. BACKGROUND

Osinger…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. BagdasarianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  2. United States v. KilbrideCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. United States v. Jovica PetrovicCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
  4. United States v. Rakesh DhingraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  5. United States v. ShraderCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Neil O'Brien v. John WeltyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  2. United States v. RahimiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2023
  3. United States v. Amy GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
  4. People v. RelerfordIllinois Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Wagner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2018

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API