United States v. Christopher Osinger
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge RAWLINSON; Concurrence by Judge WATFORD.
OPINION
RAWLINSON, Circuit Judge:
Appellant Christopher Osinger (Osinger) challenges his conviction for stalking in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2261A. Osinger asserts a facial challenge to 18 U.S.C. § 2261A as unconstitutionally vague on its face and as applied to his conduct.
*941Osinger also maintains that the district court’s sentence of 46 months’ imprisonment was unreasonable because his acceptance of responsibility and a sentencing disparity warranted a more lenient sentence. We affirm Osinger’s conviction and sentence.
I. BACKGROUND
Osinger…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. BagdasarianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. KilbrideCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Jovica PetrovicCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Rakesh DhingraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. ShraderCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Neil O'Brien v. John WeltyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. RahimiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2023
- United States v. Amy GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- People v. RelerfordIllinois Supreme Court · 2017
- Wagner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2018
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.