Legal Opinion

Palmer v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 14, 1998No. 97SC369PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bender

We review the court of appeals’ decision in People v. Palmer, 944 P.2d 634, 637 (Colo.App.1997), which held that “conspiracy to commit reckless manslaughter” is a cognizable crime in Colorado. We conclude that it is not.

The gist of the crime of conspiracy is an agreement, between two or more persons, to commit or attempt to commit a crime. See •§ 18-2-201(3.), 6 C.R.S. (1997). Conspiracy requires two distinct mental states. First, it requires the specific intent to agree to commit a particular crime. Second, it requires the- specific intent — or the conscious objective — to cause the result…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. HolbronHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Bogdanov v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  3. Watkins v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  4. People v. FrysigSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  5. People v. HoinvilleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Griego v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  2. Auman v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  3. People v. VigilColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Commonwealth v. RoebuckSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. Howard-Walker v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2019

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API