Legal Opinion

Griego v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 20, 2001No. 99SC228PublishedCited by 159 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bender

In this appeal we hold that the offense of driving after revocation prohibited 1 includes the material element of "knowingly" as the culpable mental state of this crime and that jury instructions should include the definition of "knowingly" as defined in section 18-1-501(6), 6 C.R.S. (2000). The court of appeals in People v. Griego, 988 P.2d 99 (Colo.App.1998) held that the trial court's failure to define the culpable mental state of "knowingly" in its jury instructions was not error and affirmed Griego's conviction. We disagree with this reasoning. We hold that the jury should be instructed…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Vaughan v. McMinnSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  4. Bogdanov v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  5. Union Insurance Co. v. HoutzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by159 opinions

  1. Gonzales v. Duenas-AlvarezSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. People v. MillerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  3. People v. FrySupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
  4. People v. NovotnySupreme Court of Colorado · 2014
  5. People v. PahlColorado Court of Appeals · 2006

154 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API