Commonwealth v. Roebuck
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Justice SAYLOR.
In this appeal, we consider whether it is possible, as a matter of law, to be convicted as an accomplice to third-degree murder.
The complete factual background is somewhat cumbersome. For present purposes, it is enough to say the Commonwealth presented evidence that the victim was lured to an apartment complex, where he was ambushed, shot, and mortally wounded. Appellant participated, with others, in orchestrating the events, but he did not shoot the victim.1
For his role, Appellant was charged with, among other offenses, murder of the third degree. See 18 Pa.C.S. §…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Commonwealth v. DrumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868
- Commonwealth v. FlanaganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Commonwealth v. MarkmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- State v. BacaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
- Commonwealth v. HallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Commonwealth v. FisherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Commonwealth v. DantzlerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Commonwealth v. NaranjoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Commonwealth v. MitchellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Commonwealth v. GiordanoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.