Legal Opinion

People v. Hoinville

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided August 9, 1976No. 27165PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Pringle

The defendant, Richard Hoinville, was charged with crimes of first- degree arson 1 , second-degree arson 2 , and conspiracy to commit arson 3 . The jury returned verdicts of not guilty of first and second-degree arson and guilty of conspiracy. Defendant appeals from the conspiracy conviction.

The People concede that under the rule announced in People v. Pleasant, 182 Colo. 144, 511 P.2d 488 (1974), the conspiracy conviction must be set aside because the instructions and verdict forms neglected to specify the substantive crime alleged to be the subject of the conspiracy. We agree that the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. United States v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. People v. MarcySupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  2. People v. SporlederSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  3. People v. CasiasSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
  4. Milton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  5. People v. SaarsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API