Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Ficker

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 10, 1998No. Misc. Docket (Subtitle BV) No. 35, Sept. Term, 1994, Misc. Docket (Subtitle BV) No. 15, Sept. Term, 1995PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Sept. Term, 1995.

1Opinion of the Court

WILNER, Judge.

In two petitions, the Attorney Grievance Commission (AGC), through Bar Counsel, charged Robin K.A. Ficker (Ficker) with several violations of the Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct (MLRPC). The charges emanated from eight complaints filed between 1988 and 1992. Pursuant to former Maryland Rule BV 9 b (current Rule 16-709), we referred the two petitions to Judge Vincent E. Ferretti, Jr., of the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, to conduct a hearing and make findings of fact and proposed conclusions of law. After hearing evidence over a period of 11 days, Judge…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. BraswellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  2. Grantham v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  3. Baltimore Luggage Co. v. LigonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1955
  4. ATTORNEY GRIEV. COMM'N OF MARYLAND v. FickerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of ChambersOregon Supreme Court · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. MooneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. WardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SnyderCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GisrielCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. FoxCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API