First National Bank of Windom v. Rosenkranz
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
SPECIAL TERM OPINION
WOZNIAK, Chief Judge.
FACTS
Respondent First National Bank of Windom brought a replevin action against appellant James Rosenkranz, d/b/a Verchota Furniture, and sought a deficiency judgment for the unpaid balance on a promissory note. First National Bank had previously obtained property from Rosenkranz by replevin order, which was sold. Rosen-kranz counterclaimed, asserting wrongful interference with business relationships, wrongful repossession, and negligent and intentional infliction of emotional distress.
First National Bank moved for summary judgment and Rosenkranz moved…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Emme v. C.O.M.B., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Novus Equities Corp. v. Em-Ty PartnershipSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Olmscheid v. PatersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hoyt Properties, Inc. v. Production Resource Group, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- Sterling State Bank v. Maas Commercial Properties, LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
- Krmpotich v. City of DuluthCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- T & R Flooring, LLC v. O'ByrneCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013