Legal Opinion

First National Bank of Windom v. Rosenkranz

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 18, 1988No. C3-88-1841PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPECIAL TERM OPINION

WOZNIAK, Chief Judge.

FACTS

Respondent First National Bank of Windom brought a replevin action against appellant James Rosenkranz, d/b/a Verchota Furniture, and sought a deficiency judgment for the unpaid balance on a promissory note. First National Bank had previously obtained property from Rosenkranz by replevin order, which was sold. Rosen-kranz counterclaimed, asserting wrongful interference with business relationships, wrongful repossession, and negligent and intentional infliction of emotional distress.

First National Bank moved for summary judgment and Rosenkranz moved…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Emme v. C.O.M.B., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Novus Equities Corp. v. Em-Ty PartnershipSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  3. Olmscheid v. PatersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hoyt Properties, Inc. v. Production Resource Group, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
  2. Sterling State Bank v. Maas Commercial Properties, LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
  3. Krmpotich v. City of DuluthCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  4. T & R Flooring, LLC v. O'ByrneCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API