Legal Opinion

Olmscheid v. Paterson

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 28, 1988No. C2-88-1121, C3-88-1127PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPECIAL TERM OPINION

WOZNIAK, Chief Judge.

FACTS

Appellant Olmscheid sued respondent Paterson and respondent Minneapolis North-field and Southern Railway. Respondent railroad commenced a third-party action against respondent City of Edina. Appellant Pennsylvania General Insurance Co. moved to intervene and the motion was granted. By judgment dated February 26, 1988 the trial court dismissed the claims against respondent railroad and the City of Edina. The February 26 judgment did not address the claim of appellant Olmscheid against respondent Paterson.

Appellant Pennsylvania General Insurance Co.…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. CiurleoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
  2. Richardson v. LudwigCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
  3. Zimprich v. Stratford Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
  4. First National Bank of Windom v. RosenkranzCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  5. Krmpotich v. City of DuluthCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API