Sterling State Bank v. Maas Commercial Properties, LLC
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
SPECIAL TERM OPINION
JOHNSON, Chief Judge.
This appeal is taken from a partial judgment that determined some but not all of respondent’s claims and all of appellants’ counterclaims. The district court stated that there is no just reason for delay and directed entry of final partial judgment pursuant to rule 54.02 of the Minnesota Rules of Civil Procedure. We questioned our jurisdiction over the appeal and asked the parties to submit memoranda on the question whether the district court properly directed entry of a final partial judgment. We conclude that the benefits of interlocutory appellate…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Jordan v. PughCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Novick v. AXA NETWORK, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Emme v. C.O.M.B., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Huggins v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Erickson v. General United Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Contractors Edge, Inc. v. City of MankatoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- Contractors Edge, Inc. v. City of MankatoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- Sterling State Bank v. Maas Commercial Properties, LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- White Bear Lake Restoration Ass'n ex rel. State v. Minn. Dep't of Natural Res.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019