Legal Opinion
Duplan Corporation v. Deering Milliken, Inc.
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided November 14, 1973No. Civ. A. 71-306, 70-968, 69-1096, 68-705, 69-777, 70-14, 70-189, 70-250, 70-295, 70-358, 70-385, 70-386, 70-391, 70-493, 70- 622, 70-628, 70-677, 70-683, 71-87 to 71-102, 71-115, 71-126, 71-127 and 71-283PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ON RENEWED MOTION BY BURLINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT THAT U.S. PATENT 2,741,893 IS NOT INFRINGED BY USE OF ARCT FT MACHINES
HEMPHILL, District Judge.
Burlington’s renewed 1 motion for summary judgment 2 of non-infringe ment of United States Patent No. 2,741,893 invites decision by this court. Because of the complexity of this patent infringement litigation, the court feels it appropriate to review the guidelines to be followed where a summary judgment motion for infringement or non-infringement is being considered. It is elementary that a motion for summary judgment should…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- MacHine Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Sanitary Refrigerator Co. v. WintersSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Autogiro Company of America v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Winans v. DenmeadSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- General Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1978
- Duplan Corp. v. Deering Milliken, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1977
- Johnston v. Textron, Inc.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1984
- Cmi Corporation v. Metropolitan Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
- Fred Whitaker Company v. E. T. Barwick Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.