Legal Opinion

Meyers v. Iron County

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1941No. Docket No. 89, Calendar No. 41,423PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChandler, J.

Plaintiff appeals from an order of the department of labor and industry denying further compensation. In 1933, plaintiff, while employed by defendant Iron county, suffered a compensable injury described in the report as sprained ankle and wrenched back. An agreement for payment of compensation, describing the injury as “injured right ankle,” was entered into between plaintiff and defendant United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, filed with and approved by the department. About five months later the defendant insurer filed a petition to stop or reduce compensation which was contested by…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kalucki v. American Car & Foundry Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Merriman v. PeckMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Capwell v. BaxterMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Brunette v. Quincy Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Sovey v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kurtz v. Faygo Beverages, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Dodge v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Danford v. Contract Purchase Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1952
  4. General Motors Corp. v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Vido v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API