Legal Opinion

Brunette v. Quincy Mining Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 1917No. Docket No. 119PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Certiorari to Industrial Accident Board. Henry M. Brunette presented his claim against the Quincy Mining Company for injuries received in defendant’s employ. From an order awarding compensation, defendant brings certiorari.

1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.

Section 8, pt. 3, of the workmen’s compensation law (Act No. 10, Extra Session 1912, 2 Comp. Laws 1915, § 5461) provides as to claim for review, or appeals from the committee of arbitration to the State industrial accident board:

“The hearings of the committee [of arbitration] shall be held at the locality where the injury occurred, and the decision of the committee shall be filed with the industrial accident board. Unless a claim for review is filed by either party within seven days, the decision shall stand as the decision of the industrial accident board: Provided, That said industrial…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Roach v. Kelsey Wheel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Jones v. St. Joseph Iron WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Sovey v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Detroit United Railway v. Department of Labor & IndustryMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Dodge v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1947

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API