Merriman v. Peck
Michigan Supreme Court
Mandamus. Eelators applied for mandamus to compel respondent to vacate an order permitting an appeal to be taken from an order admitting a will to probate. The facts are stated in the opinion, and in 95 Mich. 277.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
This is an application for a mandamus to compel the respondent to vacate an order permitting an appeal to be made from an order admitting a will to probate, under section 6784, How. Stat. It appears that a previous appeal had been taken by the contestant, Dwight Merriman, and that by reason of his failure to file his record in the circuit court within the time allowed by section 6782, 3 How. Stat., the appeal was dismissed.1 Section 6784 provides that—
“If any person aggrieved by any act of the judge of probate shall, from any cause, without default on his part, have omitted to claim or…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Merriman v. PeckMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
- Loree v. ReevesMichigan Supreme Court · 1851
- Babcock v. PerryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1856
3Cited by20 opinions
- Maclean v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Grove v. Great Northern Loan Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
- Jerome v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Meyers v. Iron CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
- In re Miner's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.