Legal Opinion

Raleigh v. Alcon Laboratories, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 6, 2010No. 1-09-1790PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lavin

This appeal involves the medical and legal sequellae from a cataract surgery in which an intraocular lens was implanted in a suburban man’s eye almost 10 years ago. On October 11, 2000, plaintiff William Raleigh, D.D.S., underwent surgery on his right eye at the West Suburban Medical Center (West Suburban) in Oak Park, Illinois. Dr. Scott Rosen, an ophthalmologist, performed the procedure and implanted an ACRYSOF® intraocular lens (the ACRYSOF® Lens), developed, designed, and manufactured by Alcon Laboratories, Inc. (Alcon), in plaintiffs eye. While there were no complications during the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Heastie v. RobertsIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Smith v. Eli Lilly & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Petraski v. ThedosAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
  5. Wiedenbeck v. SearleAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Nichols v. City of Chicago HeightsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015
  2. Norabuena v. Medtronic, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2017
  3. Bonhomme v. St. JamesAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  4. Norabuena v. Medtronic, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2017
  5. Nichols v. City of Chicago HeightsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API