Legal Opinion

Bonhomme v. St. James

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 10, 2011No. 2-10-0036PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McLAREN

Justice Hutchinson concurred in the judgment and opinion.

Justice Schostok concurred in part and dissented in part, with opinion.

OPINION

Plaintiff, Paula Bonhomme, appeals from the orders of the trial court dismissing with prejudice her second and third amended complaints. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings.

The following facts were alleged in plaintiff’s third amended complaint. In April 2005, plaintiff, a resident of Los Angeles, California, began online conversations with defendant, Janna St. James, on the “Deadwood Boards,” an Internet chatroom dedicated…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Doe v. DillingIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
  2. NEUROSURGERY AND SPINE SURGERY v. GoldmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  3. Weidner v. KarlinAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  4. Marino v. United Bank of Illinois, N.A.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  5. Childs v. Pinnacle Health Care, LLCAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bonhomme v. St. JamesIllinois Supreme Court · 2012
  2. AP Properties, Inc. v. RattnerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  3. A.P. Properties v. RattnerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  4. BONHOMME v. St. JamesIllinois Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Bonhomme v. St. JamesAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API