Legal Opinion

The El Sol

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 19, 1930PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOLSEY, District Judge.

I hold both El Sol and the Sae City to blame for the collision which is the subject-matter of these two proceedings for limitation of liability.

I hold that the United States, as owner of the Sae City, is entitled to a limitation of its liability.

It is admitted by all parties that the Southern Pacific Company, as owner of El Sol, is entitled to a limitation of its liability.

I. These two cases were tried before me as one ease, and, although the procedural machinery precludes the entry of a single decree because different claims are filed in the two proceedings, the eases…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. The UmbriaSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. The NacoocheeSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. The “Colorado”Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
  4. The MartelloSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. Metropolitan S. S. Co. v. VanderbiltCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1896

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Lewys v. O'NEILLDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1931
  2. Sabine Towing Co. v. BrennanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934
  3. The DenaliCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
  4. Stelos Co. v. Hosiery Motor-Mend CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1932
  5. Securities and Exchange Commission v. TorrDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1938

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API