The El Sol
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
WOOLSEY, District Judge.
I hold both El Sol and the Sae City to blame for the collision which is the subject-matter of these two proceedings for limitation of liability.
I hold that the United States, as owner of the Sae City, is entitled to a limitation of its liability.
It is admitted by all parties that the Southern Pacific Company, as owner of El Sol, is entitled to a limitation of its liability.
I. These two cases were tried before me as one ease, and, although the procedural machinery precludes the entry of a single decree because different claims are filed in the two proceedings, the eases…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- The UmbriaSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- The NacoocheeSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- The “Colorado”Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
- The MartelloSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Metropolitan S. S. Co. v. VanderbiltCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1896
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Lewys v. O'NEILLDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1931
- Sabine Towing Co. v. BrennanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934
- The DenaliCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
- Stelos Co. v. Hosiery Motor-Mend CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1932
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. TorrDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1938
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.