Securities and Exchange Commission v. Torr
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
WOOLSEY, District Judge.
I hold that the plaintiff is entitled to an injunction against the several defendants herein served on the grounds hereinafter indicated.
I. As a preliminary, before we get into a discussion of the questions of fact or of law involved herein, it is necessary to clear up the situation of the parties.
All the defendants above named, except “John” Leslie and Lewis Yedinsky, who were not served, have appeared in this action and are, therefore, defendants here.
The defendant Hurst and the defendant Gelderman have consented to injunctions, and I do not have to consider their…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Penn Central Casualty Co. v. Pennsylvania Ex Rel. SchnaderSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. Lake Street Elevated RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. TorrCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
- Lewys v. O'NEILLDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1931
- Stelos Co. v. Hosiery Motor-Mend Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Crane Co. v. Westinghouse Air Brake Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Davis v. Pennzoil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Nichols & Co. v. Secretary of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1942
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Mono-Kearsarge Consolidated Mining Co.District Court, D. Utah · 1958
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. CulpepperCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.