Legal Opinion
Stelos Co. v. Hosiery Motor-Mend Corporation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 23, 1932PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOOLSEY, District Judge.
My judgment in this case is that the complaint must be dismissed as to all three defendants, with costs.
I. This is a suit under the patent law by the plaintiff as owner by assignment from Frank C. Stephens of patent reissue No. 16,369, reissued June 8, 1926, for the unexpired term of Stephens’ patent United States No. 1,564,379, granted to him on December 8, 1925, as a result of an application filed on September 25, 1923.
The complaint is based on the alleged infringement of claim 23 of said reissue. This is a claim for an improved method of repairing runs or ravelings…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- I. T. S. Rubber Co. v. Essex Rubber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Smith v. Magic City Kennel Club, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Lewys v. O'NEILLDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1931
- Hazeltine Corporation v. Radio Corporation of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1931
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Donner v. Sheer Pharmacal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
- Sylvania Industrial Corporation v. Visking CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1943
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. TorrDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1938
- Society of European Stage Authors & Composers, Inc. v. New York Hotel Statler Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1937
- Bryce v. National City Bank of New RochelleDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1937
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.