Legal Opinion

State v. Austin

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 15, 1974No. 66PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHARP, Justice.

Upon this appeal defendant brings forward only one assignment of error, that the trial judge committed prejudicial error when he admitted in evidence the motel registration card, S-7.

“Before any writing will be admitted in evidence, it must be authenticated in some manner — i.e.—its genuineness or execution must be proved.” 2 Stansbury’s N. C. Evidence (Brandis rev., 1973) § 195.

In State v. Vestal, 278 N.C. 561, 180 S.E. 2d 755 (1971), in a prosecution for murder, the State introduced in evidence checks, notes, and other financial documents, purportedly signed by the defendant…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. VestalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. State v. BrowderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. FulcherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. State v. FloodySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  4. State v. CanadySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  5. State v. FergusonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API