State v. Austin
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
SHARP, Justice.
Upon this appeal defendant brings forward only one assignment of error, that the trial judge committed prejudicial error when he admitted in evidence the motel registration card, S-7.
“Before any writing will be admitted in evidence, it must be authenticated in some manner — i.e.—its genuineness or execution must be proved.” 2 Stansbury’s N. C. Evidence (Brandis rev., 1973) § 195.
In State v. Vestal, 278 N.C. 561, 180 S.E. 2d 755 (1971), in a prosecution for murder, the State introduced in evidence checks, notes, and other financial documents, purportedly signed by the defendant…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. VestalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. BrowderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. FulcherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. FloodySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. CanadySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
- State v. FergusonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.