Legal Opinion

State v. Moore

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided August 9, 1983No. 65A83PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MITCHELL, Justice.

The principal question presented by the defendant’s appeal is whether the trial court committed prejudicial error by allowing the State to introduce evidence that the defendant committed a sexual crime against another individual subsequent to the crime for which he was being tried. We hold that the evidence was erroneously admitted and that its admission prejudiced the defendant and requires a new trial.

The State introduced evidence which tended to show that Lisa Burton was assaulted on 19 February 1982. Burton testified that she was working at the Old Arlington Dry Goods…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. McClainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. State v. TuggleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  3. State v. GreeneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  4. State v. SpauldingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  5. State v. LeggettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. State v. BartsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. State v. GoodeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
  3. State v. GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  4. State v. MoseleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  5. State v. HyattSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API