Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Grimm

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 1934No. Docket No. 42, Calendar No. 37,779PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, J.

This is a summary proceeding under the statute before a circuit court commissioner and but two questions are raised by the appeal: (1) Is the defense that a land contract is in legal effect a mortgage available in a summary proceeding before a circuit court commissioner or before a circuit court on appeal from the commissioner'? (2) May a judgment be entered for possession without including the amount due in such judgment1?

We have held that a circuit court commissioner, whose jurisdiction in summary proceedings for the possession of real estate is strictly statutory, has no right to try title…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McSloy v. RyanMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  2. People's Mortgage Corp. v. WiltonMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  3. German Bundesheim Society v. SchmidtMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Bauer v. WassonMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Mortgage & Contract Co. v. KupalianMichigan Supreme Court · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. 1300 Lafayette East Cooperative, Inc v. SavoyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Cohen v. Outlet Market Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Hafeli Brothers Corp. v. BonMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Singer v. Hoffman Cake Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Grimm v. ArmstrongMichigan Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API