Legal Opinion

Grimm v. Armstrong

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1936No. Docket No. 129, Calendar No. 38,612Published

1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.

In August, 1926, plaintiff owned, premises in Detroit, which he dee,ded to defendants, who erected a two-family flat on them, and gave plaintiff a land contract back, in which he agreed to pay $1,500, and the balance of $11,540 in monthly instalments. Plaintiff made regular monthly payments until December, 1932, paid $75 in January and $15 in May, 1933, leaving a balance of approxi mately $8,000 of principal on the contract. In September, 1933, defendants commenced summary proceedings to recover possession for default in payments and had judgment of restitution by a circuit court…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Armstrong v. GrimmMichigan Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API