Legal Opinion

Mortgage & Contract Co. v. Kupalian

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1930No. Docket No. 28, Calendar No. 34,464PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

In a proceeding by the plaintiff before a circuit court commissioner to recover possession of real estate held by defendants Mr. and Mrs. Kupalian under a land contract, they insisted that such contract was in legal effect a mortgage. A jury was impaneled, and so found, and a judgment of “no cause of action” was entered.

Plaintiff thereafter filed the bill of complaint herein, praying for the foreclosure of the instrument as a land contract, and had decree therefor. The attorneys for the Kupalians, who alone appeal, say in their brief that the question involved is whether the decision of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Axford v. GrahamMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Northern Michigan Building & Loan Ass'n v. ForsMichigan Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Zak v. GrayMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Armstrong v. GrimmMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Garwood v. BurtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Cohen v. Outlet Market Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API