Sons v. City of Crown Point
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DARDEN, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Linda Sons, et al, (remonstrators) appeal the trial court’s order dismissing their complaint for remonstrance against the annexation of their property to the City of Crown Point. The dispositive issue presented on appeal is whether the trial court erred by dismissing the remonstrance complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. 1
We affirm.
FACTS
On May 7, 1993, the Crown Point City Council held an emergency meeting and en-' acted Ordinance 1671, which annexed certain territory along the eastern boundary of the City of Crown Point. Ordinance 1671…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Perry v. Stitzer Buick GMC, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1994
- WOERNER, ETC. v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1961
- Mishler v. County of ElkhartIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
- Santiago v. KilmerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Albright v. PyleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Borgman v. State Farm InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- Weldon v. Universal Reagents, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- Samm v. Great Dane TrailersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- Annexation Ordinance F-2008-15 v. City of EvansvilleIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Fight Against Brownsburg Annexation v. Town of Brownsburg, IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.