Legal Opinion
Borgman v. State Farm Insurance
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided June 9, 1999No. 30A04-9810-CV-515PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BAKER, Judge.
Appellants-plaintiffs Estie and Dennis Borgman (collectively, the Borgmans), appeal the trial court’s dismissal of their complaint against the appellees State Farm Insurance Company (State Farm) and Sugar Creek Animal Hospital (the Animal Hospital) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Specifically, the Borgmans make the following allegations: (1) the trial court erroneously determined that the Worker’s Compensation Act (the Act) barred their claims for negligence and the bad faith denial of Estie’s request for worker’s compensation benefits in the trial court because…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Boehm v. Town of St. JohnIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
- Perry v. Stitzer Buick GMC, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. RendlemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
- Stump v. Commercial UnionIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
- Haimbaugh Landscaping, Inc. v. JegenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- GKN Co. v. MagnessIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- Gilbert Jarrard v. Cdi Telecommunications, Inc. And Crawford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- David Goetzke v. Ferro Corporation and Crawford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Sims v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 2003
- Parks v. Madison CountyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.