Legal Opinion

Neyens v. Donato

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1948No. 4957PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STANFORD, Chief Justice.

Appellants filed their action in forcible detainer against appellees on March 2, 1946. The summons issued in this case required appellees to answer the complaint on March 7, 1946, and on that date appellees filed both an answer and cross complaint, at which time the court set the case for a jury trial on March 14, 1946. The record shows that on March 11, 1946, before the trial date, appellants filed a motion to strike certain portions of the counterclaim and also filed a motion to dismiss the counterclaim on the ground that the only issue involved in the case was the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Olds Bros. Lumber Co. v. RushingArizona Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Hinton v. HotchkissArizona Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Town of Holbrook v. GirandArizona Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Albert Steinfeld & Co. v. Wing WongArizona Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Arizona Eastern Railroad v. CarilloArizona Supreme Court · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jacob v. MinerArizona Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Hurst v. DavisWyoming Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Mortensen v. Berzell Investments Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API