Legal Opinion
Hinton v. Hotchkiss
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided November 25, 1946No. 4879PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LA PRADE, Judge.
This proceeding is being disposed of on appellees’ motion to dismiss the appeal. The record shows that this action was instituted by appellees, plaintiffs below, to recover possession of certain real property in Maricopa County, Arizona, pursuant to the provisions of the statutes relating to forcible entry and detainer and actions for rent. Art. 12, Ch. 27, A.CA.1939. Defendants filed an answer and cross-complaint; plaintiffs. thereupon moved to strike the cross-complaint upon the ground that a cross-complaint could not be properly interposed in an action of unlawful detainer.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Keystone Copper Mining Co. v. MillerArizona Supreme Court · 1945
- Snyder v. BetschArizona Supreme Court · 1941
- Gibson v. Board of SupervisorsArizona Supreme Court · 1919
- Snyder v. BetschArizona Supreme Court · 1942
- Fourseam Block Collieries Co. v. John P. Gorman Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Wittke v. State Ex Rel. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Tom Bolack and Wife, Alice Bolack v. Rip C. Underwood, Tom Bolack and Wife, Alice Bolack v. H. K. Riddle and Dena RiddleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
- Young v. RileyWashington Supreme Court · 1961
- Tuschoff v. WestoverWashington Supreme Court · 1964
- Farmers Insurance Group v. Worth Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.