Legal Opinion

Kirschner v. West Company

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 15, 1965No. Civ. A. 27579PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUONGO, District Judge.

This matter is before me on two motions : defendant’s to confirm, and plaintiffs’ to vacate, the award of an arbitrator pursuant to the provisions, of United States Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C.A. §.§ 9 and 10, respectively. The award was rendered in connection with a dispute arising out of a contract dated July 15, 1952. The background out of which these motions emerge is:

The United States Army uses and has used rubber stoppers as closures for bottles containing pharmaceuticals. Seeking to avoid contamination of the contents of those bottles by the stoppers, the Army, in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bernhardt v. Polygraphic Co. of America, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Amicizia Societa Navegazione v. Chilean Nitrate and Iodine Sales CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
  4. San Martine Compania De Navegacion, S.A. v. Saguenay Terminals LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
  5. Karppinen v. Karl Kiefer MacHine Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Shearson Hayden Stone, Inc. v. LiangDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1980
  2. Biotronik Mess-Und Therapiegeraete GmbH & Co. v. Medford Medical Instrument Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1976
  3. Rosee v. Board of TradeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  4. Fukaya Trading Company, SA v. Eastern Marine Corp.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1971
  5. Pawlicki v. Farmers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API