Legal Opinion
Karppinen v. Karl Kiefer MacHine Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided February 13, 1951No. 101, Docket 21779PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judge.
Eino C. Karppinen and John W. Saxman, copartners doing business as Mrs. Dixon’s Products Company, moved in the district court to confirm an arbitration award which entitled them to return a machine purchased from The Karl Kiefer Machine Co. and to receive a refund of the purchase price. The award was confirmed and The Karl Kiefer Machine Co. appeals.
The underlying controversy between seller and purchaser of the machine is recited in the arbitration submission agreement and may be summarized as follows: On or about October 5, 1945, appellant sold to appellees a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jacobowitz v. HersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
- Johnson v. WellsSupreme Court of Florida · 1916
- French v. RaymondSupreme Court of Vermont · 1909
- In re the Arbitration between Rosenberg & WolfeNew York Supreme Court · 1943
- Fire Ass'n v. AllesinaOregon Supreme Court · 1907
3Cited by56 opinions
- Kolel Beth Yechiel Mechil of Tartikov, Inc. v. YLL Irrevocable TrustCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- James W. Bonar and Beverly J. Bonar v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., John S. Mc Nally, Jr., Ed LeavenworthCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- Newark Stereotypers' Union No. 18 v. Newark Morning Ledger Co., and Newark Newspaper Publishers' AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
- Karaha Bodas Co. v. Perusahaan Pertambangan Minyak Dan Gas Bumi NegaraCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- Roni K. Dogherra v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.