Warwick Long Leaf Co. v. Zorn
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
*345Nichols, J.
1. The first and second special grounds of the amended motion for new trial complain that the court erred in failing to charge the jury as to what timber suitable for sawmill purposes was, and that the jury was not instructed as to the contention of the defendant that the reason that Tract No. 2 was undercut was that it contained a large portion of timber that was not suitable for sawmill purposes.
The record does not disclose that the defendant made any timely written requests that these charges should be given to the jury, nor did the defendant’s amended answer raise the question…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Turner v. TurnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- The HANOVER FIRE INS. CO. v. ElrodCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
- Brannen v. BowenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
3Cited by7 opinions
- Rouse v. FussellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Glover v. MaddoxCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
- Atlanta Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. BurkeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- Chavers v. Kent Diversified Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
- Drum v. ShireyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.