Legal Opinion
The HANOVER FIRE INS. CO. v. Elrod
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided January 27, 1955No. 35384PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNichols, J.
Special ground 4 of the motion for new trial complains that the trial court erred in denying the defendant’s motion for nonsuit. In the bill of exceptions error is assigned on this ruling. Since, however, the defendant filed a motion for new trial, one ground of which complains that the verdict is contrary to the evidence and is without evidence to support it, an objection to the denial of its motion for nonsuit cannot be considered. Schaffer v. Moore, 59 Ga. App. 542 (2 S. E. 2d 151).
Special ground 5 complains that the trial court erred in charging Code § 56-706 as to bad faith and not…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- American Casualty Co. v. CallawayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
- Universal Credit Co. v. Service Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
- Crawford v. Western & Atlantic RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
- Schaffer v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rouse v. FussellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Glover v. MaddoxCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
- Warwick Long Leaf Co. v. ZornCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
- Great American Indemnity Co. v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
- The HANOVER FIRE INS. CO. v. ElrodCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.