Atlanta Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Burke
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Russell, Judge.
The plaintiff introduced in evidence over the defendant’s objection a capped Coca-Cola bottle containing a chain of beads, testimony regarding which was that it was purchased from a Coca-Cola vending machine, had not been opened, and the foreign substance was in it at the time of purchase, which the court admitted for the sole purpose of showing that the inspection machines used by the defendant were not infallible. The objection was then made that the bottle had not been traced back to this defendant, since it had on it the inscription “Made for Gainesville Bottling Plant” and…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Payne v. Rome Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
- Palmer Brick Co. v. ChenallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Sinkovitz v. Peters Land Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
- Atlanta Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. DannemanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
- Campbell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Ginn v. MorganSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969
- Home Depot U. S. A., Inc. v. Wabash National Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- Rose v. Figgie International, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Jackson Transportation Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Bellamy v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.