State v. HOGEVOLL
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.
This criminal case arose out of a 2005 second-season coast bull elk hunt. Defendant shot and hauled from the field an elk for which he had a tag, but he also took possession of a second elk for which he did not have a tag, which someone also had shot and killed. Defendant was charged by a “Uniform Fish/Wildlife Citation and Complaint” with “exceeding bag limit on coast bull elk.” At defendant’s trial, the trial court refused to give a special instruction that defendant requested, which would have told the jury that, to be guilty of “exceeding [the] bag limit,” defendant would have to be found…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. MurrayOregon Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. OliphantOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- Osborn v. Psychiatric Security Review BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. WoodmanOregon Supreme Court · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Lindell v. KaluginOregon Supreme Court · 2013
- Gunderson, LLC v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 2012
- Noble v. Department of Fish & WildlifeOregon Supreme Court · 2014
- Oil Re-Refining Co. v. Environmental Quality CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 2017
- Bianco v. Driver & Motor Vehicle Services DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.