Legal Opinion

State v. HOGEVOLL

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 2010No. CC 055715; CA A134536; SC S057014PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.

This criminal case arose out of a 2005 second-season coast bull elk hunt. Defendant shot and hauled from the field an elk for which he had a tag, but he also took possession of a second elk for which he did not have a tag, which someone also had shot and killed. Defendant was charged by a “Uniform Fish/Wildlife Citation and Complaint” with “exceeding bag limit on coast bull elk.” At defendant’s trial, the trial court refused to give a special instruction that defendant requested, which would have told the jury that, to be guilty of “exceeding [the] bag limit,” defendant would have to be found…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. MurrayOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. OliphantOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Osborn v. Psychiatric Security Review BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. WoodmanOregon Supreme Court · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Lindell v. KaluginOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Gunderson, LLC v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Noble v. Department of Fish & WildlifeOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Oil Re-Refining Co. v. Environmental Quality CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Bianco v. Driver & Motor Vehicle Services DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API