Legal Opinion

Noble v. Department of Fish & Wildlife

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 2014No. ODFW 700142; CA A140936; SC S060518PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.

In a judicial review of an order of the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW), the Court of Appeals rejected petitioners’ contention that ODFW’s approval of “channel-spanning fishways” associated with two small, privately maintained dams downstream from their property violated state law, including ODFW’s own rules, pertaining to fish passage for native migratory fish. Petitioners had argued that the approvals were inconsistent with administrative rules and statutes that, in their view, require that fish passage be provided whenever water is flowing past the dams, whether over the tops…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Don't Waste Oregon Committee v. Energy Facility Siting CouncilOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Burke v. Children's Services DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Gafur v. Legacy Good Samaritan Hospital & Medical CenterOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. HOGEVOLLOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Noble v. Department of Fish & WildlifeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Eastern Oregon Mining Ass'n v. Department of Environmental QualityOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Schaefer v. Marion CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  3. Growing Green Panda v. Dept. of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  4. Schaefer v. Marion CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  5. Buero v. Amazon.com Services, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2022

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API