Legal Opinion
Hill v. Affirmed Housing Group
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 9, 2014No. H038874PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PREMO, J.
Plaintiffs James C. Hill and Dawn L. Hill as trustees under a revocable trust dated February 17, 1977 (the Hills), appeal from a postjudgment order awarding contractual attorney fees to Affirmed Housing Group (Affirmed) under Civil Code section 1717.
We find no abuse of discretion and affirm.
I. Factual and Procedural Background
In the underlying suit, the Hills sued San Jose Family Housing Partners, LLC (LLC), and Affirmed, a managing member of LLC, for alleged violations of a written easement agreement. LLC and Affirmed (collectively defendants) were jointly represented by the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Akins v. ENTERPRISE RENT-A-CAR CO.California Court of Appeal · 2000
- Heppler v. J.M. Peters Co.California Court of Appeal · 1999
- Berger v. GoddenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Enpalm, Lcc v. Teitler Family TrustCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Burkhalter Kessler Clement & George LLP v. Hamilton, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Burkhalter Kessler Clement & George, LLP v. HamiltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
- C&C Properties, Inc. v. Shell Pipeline CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
- C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. v. Traffic Tech, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2021
- Garrido v. Air Liquide Industrial US CA2/2California Court of Appeal · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.